City Council · 2021-03-23

 
 
City Council Minutes – March 23, 2021 (p.1)                      A complete video of the meeting can be found at www.orem.org/meetings 
CITY OF OREM 
CITY COUNCIL MEETING 
56 North State Street Orem, Utah 
March 23, 2021 
 
This meeting was held electronically 
 to allow Councilmembers and Staff to participate. 
 
 
3:00 P.M. WORK SESSION – CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 
 
CONDUCTING 
Mayor Richard F. Brunst 
 
ELECTED OFFICIALS 
Jeff Lambson, Debby Lauret, Tom Macdonald, Terry 
Peterson, David Spencer, and Brent Sumner.  
 
APPOINTED STAFF 
Jamie Davidson, City Manager; Brenn Bybee, Assistant City 
Manager; Steven Downs, Deputy City Manager; Heather 
Schriever, City Attorney; Marc Sanderson, Fire Chief; 
Joshua Adams, Police Chief; Ryan Clark, Development 
Services Director; Charlene Crozier, Library Director; Chris 
Tschirki, Public Works Department Manager; Brandon 
Nelson, Finance Department Manager; Karl Hirst, 
Recreation Department Manager; Jason Bench, Planning 
Division Manager; and JoD’Ann Bates, City Recorder 
 
 
NOTE:  The referenced report and presentation documents for each discussion  
may be viewed at orem.org/meetings under “City Council Presentations” 
 
 
PRESENTATION – Citygate Associates, LLC.  
 
Mr. Elliott of Citygate proceeded to give some background and a mention of thanks to all those 
that helped in gathering the information.  He continued to review the Police Department Operations 
assessment as follows:  
• City Crime Data: 
o Violent Crimes 
o Property Crimes 
• Organizational Review:  
o Agency Data 
▪ Agency Turnover Analysis  
▪ Key Finding and Recommendations 
• Demands for Service:  
o CAD Incident Analysis 
o Temporal Analysis – Public Generated Calls for Service 2017-2020 
o 2019 Staffing Analysis – All calls, Minimum Staffing 
o Summary 



DRAFT 
 
City Council Minutes – March 23, 2021 (p.2)                                      A complete video of the meeting can be found at www.orem.org/meetings 
General discussion ensued regarding the types of calls during various times.   
 
Mr. Elliott continued to review:  
• Patrol Response Times:  
o Methodology 
o Data (Elements of Response Time)  
o Priority Total Response Time 90th Percentile 
 Mr. Elliott continued with presenting patrol key findings and recommendations.  
 
General discussion continued regarding the Police Department strategic plan in conjunction to the 
presented recommendations and how far they are into the implementations of that plan.  
 
Mr. Elliott continued to review:  
• General Investigations Key Findings 
• Investigation Key Recommendations 
• Support Serves Workload Analysis  
o Communications Statistics 
o Professional Standards 
o Use of Force  
• Support Key Findings and Recommendations 
o Crime Analyst 
• Support Services Key Findings and Recommendations 
Mr. Elliot concluded by reviewing some of the suggested recommendations by priority.   
 
Chief Adams stated they have started implementing some of the recommendations and will need 
to amend the strategic plan.  He stated one of the biggest issues right now is with the younger 
officers and their experience and they will need to work with them.  He stated they are happy with 
the outcome of the assessment received by Citygate and will look presently and in the future what 
they need to do to address long term strategies.  General discussion continued regarding training 
of new staff and focus on curriculum that mirrors the pay structure and provide more mental health 
training.   
 
Mr. Gary introduced the Fire/EMS Operations assessment and reviewed the following:  
• Fire Service Delivery Policy Choices 
• Setting Service Level Goals 
• Risk Assessment  
o Overall risk rating by hazard  
• Daily Minimum Staffing Plan  
• Service Demand 
o Service Demand by Year and Incident Type, 
o Service Demand by Station, 
o Service Demand by Hour of the Day by Year 
o Simultaneous Incident Activity 
o Single Station Simultaneous Incidents by Station area.  
o Unit Utilization Per Hour – engines and ladders.  
o Unit Utilization Per Hour- ambulances. 
• Response Performance 



 
 
City Council Minutes – March 23, 2021 (p.3)                      A complete video of the meeting can be found at www.orem.org/meetings 
o Current Deployment Goals 
o Response Performance – 90% Fire/EMS 
o Travel Time by Minute 
o Call to Arrival Total Response Time 
• Deployment Maps  
Mr. Gary continued to explain and discussion travel times, hot spot calls and station spacing as 
shown on a map of the city. He continued to review the following:  
• Deployment Recommendations 
• Headquarters Program Review 
o Headquarters Services Assessment Summary  
o Headquarters Key Findings and Recommendations 
• Next Steps  
o Suggested Recommendation Priorities 
 
Chief Sanderson stated he thinks there have been a number of things they have recommended that 
they have just be scratching the surface on and with the recommendations he feels they will have 
more of a direction to go and looks forward to getting starting.   
 
Mr. Davidson stated he appreciated working with Citygate and is encouraged since they have 
received the preliminary report that both Chief Adams and Chief Sanderson has adjusted their 
department to address staffing and data concerns.   He wants to reassure the City Council that both 
departments have been actively making changes in the direction of the recommendations and the 
direction they want to take their prospective departments.   He feels the city can incrementally 
grow and make changes to the programs to meet the expectations of the report.   
 
General discussion continued regarding the location of some of the fire stations and the need to 
continue to make improvements and adjustments and the need to work with the location best they 
can due to the recommendations.  Further discussion continued regarding the need for these reports 
and why they felt it was needed.    
 
Mr. Gary concluded by stating some of the recommendations are within immediate reach and 
others are to be done over time with some more complex changes.   
 
 
DISCUSSION – FY 2022 Budget – Revenues and Compensation   
 
Mr.  Nelson discussed the overview of the revenue and operations for the 2021 budget and the 
upcoming 2022 budget.  He reviewed the following information:  
• Fiscal Year 2021 Budget: 
o Major General Fund Revenues to date  
o 2021 Budget Major General Fund Revenues 
o Other Sale Tax Revenue information by category  
o Other Major Revenues to date 
• Fiscal Year 2022 Revenue and Compensation:  
o Major General Fund Revenues  
o Other Major Revenues Budget 
 



DRAFT 
 
City Council Minutes – March 23, 2021 (p.4)                                      A complete video of the meeting can be found at www.orem.org/meetings 
General discussion ensued regarding B&C Road and Transportation revenues and the possible 
sustainability of the numbers and how the numbers have conservatively been reached.   
 
Mr. Nelson turned the discussion over to Mrs. Rugg to present and discuss the 2022 fiscal year 
compensation and benefits.   
 
Mrs. Rugg stated some of the changes include the following:  
• A third-party market competitiveness study 
• The public safety hybrid step program for police and fire departments 
• Merit based/pay for performance for all employees who are not a part of the public safety 
hybrid step program  
She continued to review the following employee information:  
• Employee turnover – all full-time benefited employees 
o Orem turnover rate vs. Utah Unemployment Rate 
o Turnover by reason 
o Turnover by department  
o Turnover rates: Key Departments 
▪ Police, Fire, Public Works and all other Departments 
• FY22 Compensation and Benefits: 
o Total compensation (pay, benefits and retirement)  
• Other items of consideration. 
 
Mayor Brunst thanked Mr. Nelson and Mrs. Rugg for their work and information.  
 
 
 
DISCUSSION – State Legislative Update/Orem Specific Outcomes 
 
Mrs. Schriever stated she has put together a video regarding all the changes and will provide that 
to the Council.  She will try and hit the high points that will affect the City of Orem at this time 
which included:  
• HB433: Amendments related to infrastructure funding -- Land Use & Transportation 
• HB128: Local accumulated funds balance amendment – General Governance 
• HB162: Peace officer training amendments – Public Safety 
Mrs. Schriever continued to review some of the bills that did not pass and voiced her thanks for 
the help received from the council in regard to some of the hotter topic bills.   
 
Mr. Davidson stated that Mrs. Schriever’s role up at the legislature has been invaluable to not 
only us as a community but even broader with the Utah League of Cities and Towns.  She had 
spent almost every day engaged in some legislative matter and feels she is worthy of recognition 
and appreciation. He also voiced his appreciation for Mr. Bybee and his efforts as related to the 
legislature.  This was a difficult session and they did a fantastic job and is appreciative of their 
work.   
 
Mayor Brunst expressed his appreciation to those involved with the recent legislative session 
which would also include Senator Bramble and Representative Val Peterson who were 
champions of the road projects.   



 
 
City Council Minutes – March 23, 2021 (p.5)                      A complete video of the meeting can be found at www.orem.org/meetings 
Agenda Review & Preview of Upcoming Agenda Items 
 
The City Council reviewed the evening’s agenda. Discussion ensued regarding the scheduled items 
that would be considered. 
  
 
City Council Reports & City Manager Information Items 
Mr. Davidson reviewed some informational items for the Council which included the following:    
• The barricades around the north side of the Public Safety Building is due to a fuel line 
disconnection that leaked diesel fuel into the ground.  The ground will be pulled out and 
taken to a place for contaminated ground.  There are some lines that will need further 
review and inspection.  There may be some additional work after testing is done.   
• We have seen growth in our sales tax but there is some flexibility in those numbers due to 
the unknown.  Most recent numbers are actually down 2% from last year.  
• Community Park and the Water Tank Project has been continuing, they are still exploring 
locations with several proposals that are being evaluated and some of the original proposals 
being revisited.  Mr. Farley has represented there may be some negotiation in the purchase 
price if the city sees to move in that direction.  Whatever they do there could be a substantial 
cost with any of the options and will continue to evaluate what is best for the neighborhood 
and the costs perspectives.   
• In addition to the tank discussion there is also a well and pump station associated with the 
project.  They are becoming increasingly confident that it will not be necessary for the 
city to purchase the home they currently have earnest money down on to assist with the 
construction of the pump house and the well project.  This will come back to the council 
for further review in the future.  
• They are also putting together preliminary steps to construct well #11.  This is a well 
that is considered necessary to help offset some of the demand that comes from the 
northeast section of the city and one of the properties or the primary property that 
they are looking at right now is a property that is just due east of the Wiggy Wash 
along 1600 north that the city purchased a number of years ago.  He felt it could be a 
good use of the property for various reasons.   
• Governor Cox allowed Utah County to move toward the moderate index of the Covid 
pandemic.  That then puts the city in a situation where they can relax on some of the 
requirements related to activities.  For example, the SCERA and Hale Center Theatre, 
providing people wear masks can now fill their seats.  This also comes back to when 
the council would feel comfortable in transitioning back to convening in person. 
Discussion ensued regarding mask recommendations or mandates and the ability the city has to 
mandate mask requirements within the city if the State removes the mandate.  
 
Mr. Davidson concluded by extending his thanks and appreciation to the Recreation Staff and City 
Staff for their wiliness to help over the last week and weekend in showing and getting the Fitness 
Center open and welcoming for the residents of Orem.   He feels they really need to give a lot of 
thanks to Method Studio and Big D Construction, the Library Hall and Fitness Center are two 
beautiful buildings.  He appreciates everyone’s support in celebrating the new Fitness Center and 
Library Hall.   



DRAFT 
 
City Council Minutes – March 23, 2021 (p.6)                                      A complete video of the meeting can be found at www.orem.org/meetings 
6:00 P.M. REGULAR SESSION – COUNCIL CHAMBERS 
 
 
CONDUCTING 
Mayor Richard F. Brunst  
 
ELECTED OFFICIALS 
Jeff Lambson, Debby Lauret, Tom Macdonald, Terry 
Peterson, David Spencer, and Brent Sumner 
 
APPOINTED STAFF 
Jamie Davidson, City Manager; Brenn Bybee, Assistant City 
Manager; Steven Downs, Deputy City Manager; Heather 
Schriever, City Attorney; Marc Sanderson, Fire Chief; 
Joshua Adams, Police Chief; Ryan Clark, Development 
Services Director; Charlene Crozier, Library Director; Chris 
Tschirki, Public Works Department Manager; Brandon 
Nelson, Finance Department Manager; Karl Hirst, 
Recreation Department Manager;  Jason Bench, Planning 
Division Manager; Steve Earl, Deputy City Attorney; and 
JoD’Ann Bates, City Recorder. 
 
CALL TO ORDER 
 
 
Mayor Brunst read the following to begin the meeting: 
“Pursuant to Mayor Richard F. Brunst's Proclamation dated April 26, 2021, the Orem City Council 
meeting on March 23, 2021 will be an all-electronic meeting. There will be no anchor location for 
the meeting. The City cannot ensure the recommended minimum of six feet of social distancing 
for meeting participants at the usual anchor location in the Orem City Council Chambers. 
Therefore, holding the meeting at the City Council Chambers would present a substantial risk to 
the health and safety of those who may be present at the meeting and may contribute to the spread 
of COVID-19. There will be no public access to the Orem City Council chambers. Those desiring 
to view or participate in the meeting must do so electronically. 
 
To view the meeting: please go to orem.org/meetings. 
To make a comment: Please submit your comment through: orem.org/comments 
 
Written comments will be accepted before and during the meeting. All written comments received 
will be entered into the record and forwarded to each City Council member for review. Written 
comments will also be read aloud during the live meeting when required by law or when time 
permits. As technology permits, the City Council may also accept oral comments. Once an item 
has been voted on, that item will be closed to additional comments. Thank you for your cooperation 
during these challenging times.” 
 
 
INVOCATION /  
INSPIRATIONAL THOUGHT  
Brent Sumner    
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 
Brenn Bybee 
 
 
MAYOR’S REPORT/ITEMS REFERRED BY COUNCIL 



 
 
City Council Minutes – March 23, 2021 (p.7)                      A complete video of the meeting can be found at www.orem.org/meetings 
PRESENTATION: Natural Resources Stewardship Committee  
 
 Mr. Hawkins introduced those residents that are on the Natural Resources Stewardship Committee 
(NRSC) with Jeff Lambson as their Council representative.  He continued to by reviewing the 
NRSC projects which included the following:  
• 2020 - A year of learning: 
o Smart water meters 
o Farmland preservation 
o Provo River Delta 
o Bike path   
o Brownfields plan 
o Meeting with Council members individually 
• A year of Community Building:  
o Orem City Green Team  
o Earth Day Youth Art Context  
o Social Media Outreach  
o Orem Outside 
• A year of Progress and Discussion: 
o Progress was highlighted by the Mayor in the December Newsletter to include:  
▪ 30% reduction in water use per person 
▪ 64% reduction in air pollution emissions 
▪ More mass transit 
▪ Tier 3 Gas 
• 2021 Priorities: 
o Recognizing community business leader is stewardship 
o Agricultural land preservation  
o Promoting wise water use on social media 
o Bike plan  
o Brownfields 
o Library Education Station  
o Outdoor recreation opportunities: Timp playground, Hillcrest Park  
o Fall Farm Festival 
o Orem City Green Team.  
 
Mayor Brunst shared some information for the committee regarding looking into specific grants 
and funding for some of their projects.   
 
Mrs. Lauret and Mr. Lambson thanked them for their hard work and stated how much they enjoyed 
being involved with their committee.   
 
 
PERSONAL APPEARANCES 
 
Time was allotted for the public to express their ideas, concerns, and comments on items not 
scheduled as public hearings on the agenda. Those wishing to make a comment provided staff with 
written comments. 
 



DRAFT 
 
City Council Minutes – March 23, 2021 (p.8)                                      A complete video of the meeting can be found at www.orem.org/meetings 
Public comments were made by the following: 
o Lachelle Thompson 
o Barbara Pulley 
o Jim Condie 
 
Written public comments submitted were read into the record. Written comments that were 
submitted are attached to the end of the minutes in their entirety.   
 
 
CONSENT ITEMS 
 
• APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES 
o Minutes of City Council Meeting – March 9, 2021 
• RESOLUTION – Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Utah County and Orem 
City for the Administration of the 2021 Municipal Elections   
Mayor Brunst moved to approve the Consent Agenda as listed. Mr. Lambson seconded the 
motion. Those voting aye: Richard F. Brunst, Jeff Lambson, Debby Lauret, Tom Macdonald, Terry 
Peterson, David Spencer, and Brent Sumner. The motion passed. 
 
 
SCHEDULES ITEMS 
 
PUBLIC HEARING / RESOLUTION  
The City will receive Public Comment on the and consider approval of a resolution for a 
substantial amendment to the 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan. 
 
Mr. Ransom stated that due to the Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19), the U.S. Department of 
Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant provided the City of 
Orem with a second CDBG allocation of $287,940 to be used to prevent, prepare for, and 
respond to COVID-19. Based on the recommendations from the CDBG Advisory Commission, 
the City of Orem would like to allocate funds from the previously allocated $258,049.16 in 
CDBG-CV funding for public service projects to the following projects: $24,000 to City of 
Orem Victim Services to pay a portion of the salary of one advocate to better help address 
increasing domestic violence rates, $5,000 to City of Orem Police Department’s Mental Health 
Response Team to help provide small resources to homeless and low to moderate mental health 
residents to better address growing homeless and mental health issues in the community, $1,650 
to Sharon Park Elementary to pay for a bi-level water bottle filling station to help them prevent 
COVID and mitigate its impacts, $3,300 to Orem Junior High School to pay for two bi-level 
water bottle filling stations to help them prevent COVID and mitigate its impacts, and $30,000 
($27,000 in direct assistance, $3,000 for program operation costs) to Community Action 
Services and Food Bank for mortgage assistance for low to moderate homeowners living in the 
City of Orem struggling to help make mortgage payments due to the direct impact of COVID-19. 
Mayor Brunst opened the public hearing at 6:28 p.m.  Hearing not comments he closed the public 
hearing and brought the item back to the Council for further discussion.  



 
 
City Council Minutes – March 23, 2021 (p.9)                      A complete video of the meeting can be found at www.orem.org/meetings 
Mayor Brunst moved, to approve by Resolution for a substantial amendment to the 2019-2020 
Annual Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Projected Use of 
Funds for CARES ACT CDBG-CV funding   Mr. Spencer seconded the motion.  Those voting 
aye: Richard F. Brunst, Jeff Lambson, Debby Lauret, Tom Macdonald, Terry Peterson, David 
Spencer, and Brent Sumner. The motion passed. 
 
 
RESOLUTION/FENCE MODIFICATION 
Applicant requests approval for a six foot SimTek fence between their commercial property 
and two residential properties to the east of Sun River Gardens located at 312 West 1200 
North in the C2 zone 
Mr. Bench stated that the Sun River Gardens recently received site plan approval to build a new 
storage building on the property at 312 West 1200 North. One of the requirements of this 
approval was that a seven foot high masonry wall be built to separate their commercial property 
from the residential properties that are adjacent to their property. The resident at 298 West 1200 
North, which is directly to the east of Sun River Gardens, recently installed a SimTek fence 
between their property and Sun River Gardens. This SimTek fence is six feet high. It matches the 
fence on the other side of their property and they do not want to have it replaced.  The other 
property owner who borders Sun River Gardens on the northeast part of the lot, currently has a 
chain link fence which separates their property from Sun River Gardens. They are in favor of 
Sun River Gardens matching the six foot high SimTek fencing that currently exists along the 
southern property line.  Both of the neighbors who border Sun River Gardens prefer the current 
six foot SimTek fence to be the divider between the commercial property and their residential 
properties. They do not want a seven foot masonry fence.  The applicant requests the fence 
requirement be modified to leave the six foot SimTek fence in place and extend it to the north. 
Pursuant to Section 22-14-19(F) of the City Code, the City Council may modify the fence 
requirement if it finds that: 
1. The proposed fence provides an adequate buffer for the adjoining residential zone. 
2. The appearance of the fence will not detract from uses in the residential zone. 
3. The proposed fence will shield the residential use from noise, storage, traffic or any other 
characteristic of commercial or professional office uses that are incompatible with residential 
uses. 
The adjoining residential property owners have indicated in writing that they support the 
proposed modification and their letters are included with this agenda summary.  He conclude 
that staff has reviewed the proposed fence modification and believes the request meets all of the 
requirements listed above. 
Discussion ensued regarding a concern of setting a precedence in future requests, and how it is 
built into the ordinance that allows an application to be made and the need to appear before the 
council for each approval.  
Mayor Brunst moved, to approve by Resolution for a six foot SimTek fence between their 
commercial property and two residential properties to the east of Sun River Gardens located at 
312 West 1200 North in the C2 zone.  Mr. Macdonald seconded the motion.  Those voting aye: 
Richard F. Brunst, Jeff Lambson, Debby Lauret, Tom Macdonald, Terry Peterson, David 
Spencer and Brent Sumner. The motion passed. 
 
 



DRAFT 
 
City Council Minutes – March 23, 2021 (p.10)                                      A complete video of the meeting can be found at www.orem.org/meetings 
COMMUNICATION ITEMS 
There were no additional communication items  
 
CITY MANAGER INFORMATION ITEMS 
The City Manager had no additional Information Items to share.   
 
 
ADJOURNMENT TO A MEETING OF THE OREM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 
(RDA) 
 
Mayor Brunst moved to adjourn to a meeting of the Orem Redevelopment Agency (RDA).  Mr. 
Spenser seconded the motion. Those voting aye: Richard F. Brunst, Jeff Lambson, Debby Lauret, 
Tom Macdonald, Terry Peterson, David Spencer, and Brent Sumner. The motion passed. 
 
 
The meeting adjourned at 6:27 p.m. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
JoD’Ann Bates, City Recorder 
Approved: April 13, 2021 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



 
 
City Council Minutes – March 23, 2021 (p.11)                      A complete video of the meeting can be found at www.orem.org/meetings 
PUBLIC COMMENTS – March 23, 2021 
 
7.      PERSONAL APPEARANCES 
Lachelle Thompson  
I have some concerns about the large developments proposed on 1600 W. and 400 N. 1. 1600 N 
is already very narrow and crowded as you go East to access 1-15. I'm concerned that we are 
adding more residents to an area that isn't equipped to handle the current traffic needs. I request 
that the 1600 N access to I-15 be widen with more lanes before we add more residents. 2. I'm 
concerned about the increase of traffic in residential neighborhoods. I request parking lot access 
to these developments be off State Street or where 1600 N is business zoned, not in residential 
neighborhoods like 400 N or west 1600 N. 3. I'm concerned about the proposed 6 story height of 
these developments so close to residential neighborhoods and by businesses that are single or 
two story structures. I request setbacks of 75 feet from residential homes and structure height 
lower as it approaches existing homes. 
 
Barbara Pulley 
We moved to Orem in 1969. To put that into perspective we moved here before they had a traffic 
signal light at the intersection of 1600 North and State Street. We have lived on 1600 North this 
entire time. We have watched a quiet country road turn into an extremely busy city street. We 
built our home on property that my Grandfather owned and farmed until his death, so it is 
meaningful to me, and is the main reason why we have stayed in Orem. When we wanted to 
build our home we were only able to do so, if we put in the sidewalk, curb and gutter along our 
property, and it had to be done at our expense. Later on the City put in the sidewalk, curb and 
gutter all along 1600 North at the Cities expense (our taxes) for all those who didn't have it. Then 
the street became so busy that the City had to come in on our frontage to widen the road, and 
they tore up my sidewalk without any consideration. That's not the end of the story! A second 
time they widened the road and again came in on our frontage. This time we were left without a 
pull over in front of our house. Our newspaper delivery person told us it was to dangerous for 
him to deliver the paper to us , and we would need to move our paper box. So after 50 years we 
stopped taking the newspaper. And now we have the City figuring to allow a development that 
will further frustrate the people who live in our area with even busier streets! There are certain 
times of the day when we can't get out of our driveway as it is! Sadly this is only one of the 
problematic issues we will be dealing with. Orem City, we have put up with a lot over the years 
since we have been here, but this one is just asking to much! 
 
 
Jim Condie 
I want to thank the city planning folks for making this recommendation. I am happy that the 
council passed the 75' setback. The residential rezone adds an additional setback to the height 
that will help preserve our privacy and somewhat of a neighborhood feel. The developer has 
rights to develop his property, and he purchased bottlenecked property with no real access to 
State street. Development should be pushed toward state street. He needs realistic plans for the 
property he purchased. Thank You! 



DRAFT 
 
City Council Minutes – March 23, 2021 (p.12)                                      A complete video of the meeting can be found at www.orem.org/meetings 
 
 
9.1 
PUBLIC HEARING / RESOLUTION - The City will receive Public Comment on 
the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Projected Use of Funds for CARES 
ACT CDBG-CV funding and consider approval of a resolution for a substantial 
amendment to the 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan. 
 
None